Dan Margulis Applied Color Theory
The Photoshop Gamut Warning
Gamut warning?
Posted by: "John Ruttenberg"
Mon Feb 26, 2007 11:50 am (PST)
I feel kind of stupid asking this, but what does this
View option actually do? What gamut does it compare with. In LAB, for
example, it shows things being OOG, but I'd be surprised if they were out
of LAB's gamut.
Is it the default CMYK gamut? Is it settable?
This just has to be a FAQ.
--John Ruttenberg
___________________________________________________________________________
Re: Gamut warning?
Posted by: "mac townsend"
Mon Feb 26, 2007 1:16 pm (PST)
yep. yep, by changing your cmyk settings.
Mac Townsend
Adcom Graphics Digital Imaging
Fairfield, California
www.adcomgraphics.com
___________________________________________________________________________
Re: Gamut warning?
Posted by: Andrew Rodney
Mon Feb 26, 2007 1:16 pm (PST)
Whatever you have loaded in Custom Proof Setup is
what©ˆs currently being used. And it©ˆs usefulness?
Virtually none.
Andrew Rodney
___________________________________________________________________________
Re: Gamut warning?
Posted by: "Ipac"
Mon Feb 26, 2007 1:56 pm (PST)
gamut warning, that is said not to be very reliable,
shows you the colors out of the gamut of the profile setted in the proof
setup. for the reason you said you cannot set lab in the proof setup, it
would never show any warning this way.
best regards
Ignazio Pacces
___________________________________________________________________________
Re: Gamut warning?
Posted by: "Mike Russell"
Mon Feb 26, 2007 2:52 pm (PST)
There actually are colors in the wider gamut RGB
profiles that are outside of Photoshop's Lab -128 to 127 representation.
Mike Russell
www.curvemeister.com/forum/
___________________________________________________________________________
Re: Gamut warning?
Posted by: Dan Margulis
Mon Feb 26, 2007 2:53 pm (PST)
It's quite inaccurate (example: take an Adobe RGB file,
convert it to LAB and ask it, without further changes, to show what colors
are out of the Adobe RGB gamut--quite a lot, according to this option).
Even if it were perfect, however, I don't see any use
for it--it would be reporting colors that are so mildly out of gamut as to
create no problem, in the same manner as it reports grossly OOG ones that
could wreck the conversion. Anybody who can't identify areas that are
grossly OOG without the help of this tool is in big trouble IMHO.
It would be better if there were a control that allowed
us to specify how *far* OOG the color would have to be before being
displayed as such, but there isn't any formula at present that gives
acceptable results--many darker colors that by current formulas are far OOG
are not noticeable, but lighter ones whose numbers suggest they are closer
might be quite objectionable.
Dan Margulis