Dan Margulis Applied Color Theory
Random Spots on Old Prints
Date: Wed, 19 May 2004 14:28:34 -0500
From: "R. Lutz"
Subject: Random spots on old prints
I know I'm pressing the envelope for acceptable topics
here, but I hope this problem will intrigue some of the creative thinkers
on this list.
If you have had occasion to restore old prints you have
probably had to remove a random peppering of dark spots at one time or
another. There is an example of such peppering on my web site at: http:
//www.lutzphotography.com/webspots.jpg
I have two questions:
First, what causes the spots? The prints are
usually old (80 + yrs) B&W (toned or not).
Second, is there a clever way to remove them en-masse
rather than individually with the clone or healing brush tools?
Dick Lutz
___________________________________________________________________________
Date: Wed, 19 May 2004 14:19:00 -0700
From: Mike Russell
Subject: Re: Random spots on old prints
Brown-ish spots like this are often caused by iron
impurities in the emulsion. This used to be quite a common QA problem
in the days when glass plates were made using the local water supply, and I
suppose the same issue affected paper emulsions as well..
Photoshop's dust and scratches (D+S), which is a
thresholded median filter, was designed to remove just this sort of noise.
I find a setting of radius 3, threshold 10 gets rid of the small dark
dots in your image quite nicely.
The trick with D+S, as with any noise reduction filter,
is to stop before you start to erode actual image detail. Detail
tends to cover the dots, so sometimes I select areas of low detail with the
lasso tool, and filter these selectively.
You could get a serviceable result at this point by
simply pulling out the red channel but there is more that can be done
regarding the more diffuse, yellowish blotches.
In your sample image, the dots are colored, and there
an immediate improvement results if you simply drop the overall saturation
of the image. You may be able to experiment with using, say, the blue
channel to generate a mask to select out the dots.
Mike Russell
www.curvemeister.com
www.geigy.2y.net
___________________________________________________________________________
Date: Wed, 19 May 2004 18:01:17 -0700
(PDT)
From: roger popek
Subject: Re: Random spots on old prints
When I read Dan's book he mentioned that fixing
blemishes in LAB will work good.
___________________________________________________________________________
Date: Thu, 20 May 2004 07:12:15 -0700
(PDT)
From: Martin Gross
Subject: Re: Random spots on old prints
A real easy way to get rid of the spots is as follows:
1. Make a copy of the image on a new layer
2. filter - blur - Gaussian blur of about 4 or 5 pixels
to completely blur the new layer which will be on the top to the point
where the dots blend in with the rest of the picture.
3. Move the blurred layer below the original layer.
4. Selectively erase those areas exhibiting the problem
on the original layer exposing the blurred sections from the layer below
it.
___________________________________________________________________________
Date: Thu, 20 May 2004 04:19:50 -0400
From:John Castronovo
Subject: Re: Random spots on old prints
From: "Mike Russell"
The trick with D+S, as with any noise reduction filter,
is to stop before
you start to erode actual image detail. Detail
tends to cover the dots, so
sometimes I select areas of low detail with the lasso
tool, and filter these
selectively.
I'll add that if you do the D&S, use a duplicate
layer so the process is reversible, then you could play with the 'blend if'
sliders to make sure that you do the least damage.
john c.
___________________________________________________________________________
Date: Thu, 20 May 2004 08:56:17 -0400
From: Preston Earle
Subject: Re: Random spots on old prints
I don't know what causes them, but have you tried the
Polaroid Dust & Scratch Removal software available free from
http:
//www.polaroid.com/service/software/poladsr/poladsr.html? At very low
settings, it eliminates most of the smallest spots with only a barely
noticeable (if any) increase in image softness. Then cloning or healing the
larger spots is much easier. I use it frequently, and though not perfect,
it's really good.
Preston Earle
___________________________________________________________________________
Date: Thu, 20 May 2004 15:14:47 -0400
From: Lanny Lathem
Subject: Re: Random spots on old prints
One can also do something similar using the history
brush.
1. Apply the desired filter to decrease or blur the
spots.
2. Set the origin in the history pallette on that
history state.
3. Set the destination the history state before the
filter was applied.
4. 'Paint' the spots with the history brush effectively
painting the
filtered version of the image onto the original.
Lanny Lathem
Bennett Graphics
___________________________________________________________________________
Date: Thu, 20 May 2004 14:45:10 -0700
From: "Kyle L. Hildebrant"
Subject: RE: Random spots on old prints
Lanny’s is the better of the suggestions I have
heard. :-)
________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sat, 22 May 2004 12:41:27 -0500
From: "R. Lutz"
Subject: Random spots on old prints
Thanks to everyone who replied. Nearly everyone
recommended the noise filter, dust and scratches --in combination with the
history brush. This did the job. For anyone interested I posted a before
and after at: http://www.lutzphotography.com/webspots.html
It was suggested that "foxing" is the term that describes these spots on old prints. The recollection was "right on". Google provided this link to a description of foxing:
Preston E. recommended trying Polaroids free dust &
scratches software, available at:
http:
//www.polaroid.com/service/software/poladsr/poladsr.html?
I gave it a try and thought I might mention two things.
First, you have the option to download both a plug-in to run in your
current version of Photoshop and a separate dust and scratches application
which runs apart from Photoshop. On my system (Os X.3 and Photoshop
CS) the plug-in would freeze Photoshop every time. The application software
however, worked very well. Second, the dust and scratches application
worked first by selecting the spots and then removing them. I would like to
know how to select the (small pepper like) spots. A couple of you
mentioned selecting the spots. How would you do it?
Dick Lutz
___________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sat, 22 May 2004 17:31:42 -0500
From: "jimbean
Subject: Re: Random spots on old prints
hello dick, could not view your before/after, only the
copyright Lutz was viewable . I believe the majority of your spots were
just plain old dirt, although they did look a little like something that
was in a fire/got damp-wet.. caught a little soot... I think foxing
is associated with moisture/fungus growth.. looks dusty in spots.. and when
you brush the dust away (on the emulsion side).. the image goes with it...
jim bean
___________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sun, 23 May 2004 14:36:35 -0500
From: "R. Lutz"
Subject: Re: Random spots on old prints
Sorry, Jim. See if this works:
http://www.lutzphotography.com/webspots2.html
You'll have to scroll down to see everything. I'd
be interested to know which OS and browser you use if you don't mind
contacting me off list. For my email address replace the and
with an @ symbol. rlutzandavalon.net
Dick Lutz
___________________________________________________________________________
Date: Mon, 24 May 2004 00:47:46 -0400
From: Dan Margulis
Subject: Re: Random spots on old prints
Dick Lutz writes,
Thanks to everyone who replied. Nearly everyone
recommended the noise
filter, dust and scratches --in combination with the
history brush.
This did the job.
The recommendation is a good one, but one thing should
be added: if you are trying to erase large blobs of dark noise with the
Dust & Scratches filter, you tend to erase a lot of delicate white
detail that then has to be restored with the history brush or a layer mask.
The solution is to run the Dust & Scratches layer in Lighten, not
Normal, mode. It may be necessary to darken the top layer very slightly to
further restrict its action. If this is done, further retouching will be
sharply reduced.
selecting the spots. How would you do it?\
If you are happy with the "selection" made by
Dust & Scratches, you can save it as a mask and use it on the original
image later:
1) Make copy of image.
2) Make two duplicate layers.
3) Top layer, Dust & Scratches.
4) Set top layer to Lighten mode.
5) Merge top two layers.
6) Set the new merged layer to Difference mode.
7) Flatten image.
8) Auto Levels.
9) Slight Gaussian blur as customary in masks of this
type.
10) Convert to grayscale and save.
Dan Margulis
___________________________________________________________________________
Date: Mon, 24 May 2004 14:44:49 -0500
From: "R. Lutz"
Subject: Re: Random spots on old prints
Thanks, Dan.
That's just what I was looking for. I posted
(temporarily) an example of the mask at:
Dick Lutz
___________________________________________________________________________
Date: Tue, 25 May 2004 09:27:41 -0400
From:John Castronovo
Subject: Re: Random spots on old prints
Thanks Dan.
Posts like this make it worth sticking around here in
spite of the abuse!
john c.
Adobe Photoshop training classes are taught in the US by Sterling Ledet & Associates, Inc.