Dan Margulis Applied Color Theory
Highlight Variation in Proofs
Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2004 16:29:11 -0000
From: "william_fahl"
Subject: Matchprint Highlight Variation?
I have a printer/retoucher that is telling me that a
subtle shift in color in the highlights, from one proof to another, is
common in analog Matchprints. I have never heard this before and this seems
a little strange considering the known quality and repeatability of
Matchprint proofs. The highlight area in question consists of approximately
1-C 4-M 6-Y 0-K. The shift tends to go more yellow. It is small, but
noticeable. Is this process related? Or am I viewing an acceptable
deviation.
Thanks.
Bill Fahl
Studio Manager
Copper Advertising
___________________________________________________________________________
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2004 13:31:15 -0500
From: Dan Remaley
Subject: RE: Matchprint Highlight Variation?
If the highlight dot on the proof is missing or smaller
than they should be, it could be a processing issue. It is generally an
exposure issue (under exposed). GATF makes a proof comparator (product
number 7145) designed for this very purpose, to measure dot gain, gray
balance and highlight values. <www.gain.net>
Dan
Dan Remaley
Process Control Mgr.
Graphic Arts Technical Foundation
___________________________________________________________________________
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2004 13:55:56 -0500
From: Terry Wyse
Subject: Re: Matchprint Highlight Variation?
On Feb 4, 2004, at 11:29 AM, william_fahl wrote:
I have a printer/retoucher that is telling me that a
subtle shift in
color in the highlights, from one proof to another, is
common in
analog Matchprints. I have never heard this before and
this seems a
little strange considering the known quality and
repeatability of
Matchprint proofs. The highlight area in question
consists of
approximately 1-C 4-M 6-Y 0-K. The shift tends to go
more yellow. It
is small, but noticeable. Is this process related? Or
am I viewing an
acceptable deviation.
Well, WHICH Matchprint proof are you talking about? The
term "Matchprint" can be used (legitamitally) for anything from
an analog Matchprint to a Digital Matchprint (Presstek or Creo Sopectrum
digital halftone proofer) to an HP 5500 inkjet proof marketed as the a
KPG5542 with a KPG Matchprint RIP on Matchprint inkjet base paper!
And, oops, I now read that you're specifically
referring to ANALOG Matchprints!
Particularly for the analog and digital halftone
devices, I think repeatability/reproducability under 4-5% is going to be
difficult due to the lamination/removal process. It can tend to "pick
off" smaller dots.
Terry
_____________________________
WyseConsul
Color Management Consulting
704.843.0858
___________________________________________________________________________
Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2004 13:54:33 -0500
From: Dan Margulis
Subject: Re: Matchprint Highlight Variation?
It's related more to the human visual system than it is
to the process. We are exttremely sensitive to color variation in light
colors. So, not just in matchprints, but in monitors, desktop printers,
press sheets, even film recorders, this effect is present to some
extent--if you want to pick somebody's calibration method apart, look at
the highlights.
The slightly more yellow feel could be some deficiency
in contacting but it's more likely to be that the substrate is slightly
more blue in one case than the other. That's fairly common and would be
more than enough for you to perceive a yellow shift in the highlights.
Dan Margulis
___________________________________________________________________________
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2004 15:09:06 -0500
From: Terry Wyse
Subject: Re: Matchprint Highlight Variation?
On Feb 5, 2004, at 1:54 PM, Dan Margulis wrote:
The slightly more yellow feel could be some deficiency
in contacting
but it's more likely to be that the substrate is
slightly more blue in
one case than the other. That's fairly common and would
be more than
enough for you to perceive a yellow shift in the
highlights.
Is it even possible that they may be inconsistent in
the Matchrpint base stock they're using? Maybe odd day proofing gets
Commercial Matchprint base and even days gets Publication base?? That'd
definitely alter the overall cast of the proof if you hit them on the
"wrong" day!
Cheers,
Terry
_____________________________
WyseConsul
Color Management Consulting
704.843.0858
___________________________________________________________________________
Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2004 13:23:59 -0500
From: Dolores Kaufman
Subject: Re: Matchprint Highlight Variation?
Am I missing something here and making a fool of myself
by asking this question? Oh, what the hell, it wouldn't be the first time
so here goes:
Couldn't the shift toward yellow be due somewhat to the
increased amount of yellow in the file: 1-C, 4-M, 6Y? It was always my
understanding (from reading your book, Makeready) that a neutral highlight
was in the neighborhood of 5-C, 3-M, 3-Y.
Dolores
___________________________________________________________________________
Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2004 19:35:41 -0500
From: Dan Margulis
Subject: Re: Matchprint Highlight Variation?
Dolores writes,
Couldn't the shift toward yellow be due somewhat to the
increased amount of
yellow in the file: 1-C, 4-M, 6Y? It was always my
understanding (from
reading your book, Makeready) that a neutral highlight
was in the
neighborhood of 5-C, 3-M, 3-Y.
That's true, and anyone whose highlights are 1c4m6y
will have warmish yellow highlights.
As I understood the question, though, he was asking why
Matchprint #1 had yellower highlights than Matchprint #2 made from the same
file. For that specific question, it doesn't matter whether the highlight
is neutral in the first place.
Dan Margulis
___________________________________________________________________________
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2004 21:38:53 -0700
From: Chris Murphy
Subject: Re: Matchprint Highlight Variation?
On Feb 4, 2004, at 11:29 AM, william_fahl wrote:
I have a printer/retoucher that is telling me that a
subtle shift in
color in the highlights, from one proof to another, is
common in
analog Matchprints. I have never heard this before and
this seems a
little strange considering the known quality and
repeatability of
Matchprint proofs. The highlight area in question
consists of
approximately 1-C 4-M 6-Y 0-K. The shift tends to go
more yellow. It
is small, but noticeable. Is this process related? Or
am I viewing an
acceptable deviation.
As Terry Wyse asks, the first question is what is the
exact Matchprint process being used? The term analog Matchprint implies the
multistep laminate based proofing system compromise of a particular base
and then a laminate exposed with film, for each of the four channels.
While it's possible there is some laminate variation,
my past experience with this process is that the materials are consistent
within the same batch. It's possible there is a batch to batch variation
and that's what you've seen.
But if these are proofs being prepared within hours or
days of each other, what I'd sooner expect is that the variation is coming
from a failure to stop the exposure of the laminate at the proper time,
consistently. Each laminate color will have a different exposure time and
is based on a number of variables. If they sometime stop on time and
sometimes stop 5 seconds later, or sometimes 10 seconds later, then that
might explain the variation you are seeing. Although it doesn't explain why
the shift would be more toward yellow. I'd expect inconsistent exposure of
laminates to cause a shift in whatever laminate was inconsistently
exposed...
Chris Murphy
Color Remedies (TM)
www.colorremedies.com/realworldcolor
___________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2004 07:42:58 -0800
From: J Walton
Subject: RE: Matchprint Highlight Variation?
Actually, come to think of it, when we used Analog
Matchprint we got some significant inconsistencies when we didn't draw down
long enough. As soon as we set a standard (and slightly overkill) time for
the vacuum frame to vacuum, our consistency shot up as well.
J
Adobe Photoshop training classes are taught in the US by Sterling Ledet & Associates, Inc.